profile

Hi there! I'm a financial planner for therapists!

Retirement Plans 102

Published almost 2 years ago • 3 min read

Hi Reader,

Hope your week has been going well.

Last week, I gave you an introduction to understanding the confusing world of retirement plans: aptly named Retirement Plans 101 (read the details here, if you missed it).

This week, we're going to move into Retirement Plans 102. We're going to go a bit deeper into the basics of retirement plans. This slightly deeper dive will be essential to understand if you have employees in your practice (or are thinking of starting a group practice in the future).

Read below my signature for all the fun details of Retirement Plan 102. 👇

Estimated Tax Payment due June 15th!

And don't forget that the second estimated tax payment is due next week! June 15th to be precise.

​Here's a video I recorded last June if you'd like a little explainer of what these estimated tax payments are all about.​

And as always, if you have questions about what's covered in this email (or anything else happening in your financial world), HIT REPLY and let me know. I read and reply to every email!

Best,
Dave

Retirement Plans 102: When you have Employees

If you already have employees and are looking to establish a retirement plan, there are a few more important details you’ll need to understand. Specifically we need to talk more about discrimination provisions and employer contributions. We’ll wrap things up by talking about newer “safe harbor” type plans which make all this simpler, easier and - in most cases - less expensive for small business owners.

Retirement Plan Discrimination Testing

The government wants to make sure retirement plans aren’t operating primarily for the benefit of business owners and other highly compensated employees. For that reason, the discrimination testing provisions exist.

Specifically, the discrimination calculations ensure that the plan fairly benefits non-Highly Compensated Employees (HCEs). HCE’s are generally those employees in the top 20% of compensation and anyone who owns more than 5% of the sponsoring employer. Both the full definition of an HCE and the exact nature of this discrimination testing is way beyond the scope of this article, and better left to the accountants and attorneys. Best of luck to them.

Guess what? It’s super common for small business to fail these discrimination tests. What happens then? You can fix (or “cure”) the test failure by making an employer contribution to each non-Highly Compensated Employee’s plan account.

And that brings us to the next topic we need to discuss a bit more: employer contributions.

Matching Contributions versus Nonelective Contributions

To make matters a bit more confusing, there are two different types of employER contributions. For many (not all) employer-sponsored retirement plans, the employer can choose to make contributions on behalf of employees as either matching contributions or nonelective contributions.

  1. Matching contributions are just that - the employer matches the percent of compensation that the employee elects to contribute to the retirement plan. Let’s say the plan rules stipulate that the employer matches employee contributions up to 3%. If an employee contributes 3% of their compensation, the employer will contribute an equal amount. If an employee contributes 5%, the employer still contributes only 3% - the match is only up to 3%. And if an employee contributes less than 3%, the employer only matches that lower amount. If the employee elects to contribute nothing - the employer will match that nothing and not contribute anything on behalf of that employee.
  2. Nonelective contributions are different. A nonelective contribution takes place regardless of whether the employee contributes anything. Let’s say the plan rules stipulate that the employer makes a nonelective contribution of 2% for all eligible employees. In this case, the employer contributes that 2% regardless of how much the employee contributes. Indeed, the employer must contribute 2% even if the employee decides not to contribute anything.

Remember how many small business retirement plans fail those discrimination tests? The easiest way to fix that failure is to make a nonelective contribution to the accounts of all non-Highly Compensated Employees. But what if there were a simpler way to pass the discrimination test? Good news - there is!

Safe Harbor Plans to the Rescue

Recognizing that all this is testing and after-the-fact employer contributions to fix failing those tests is a lot of rigamarole (technical term), legislatures introduced “safe harbor” retirement plans. The two most relevant for small business owners are SIMPLE IRA’s and Safe Harbor 401(k)’s.

These “safe harbor” plans allow you to skip all the complex testing if you follow the rules they put in place. The two most important rules are mandatory employer contributions and immediate vesting in employer contributions.

These safe harbor plans require annual employer contributions. These contributions can be either matching or nonelective, but the percentage of compensation is specified and must be paid on behalf of all employees annually.

Safe harbor plans also require that employees are immediately vested in all employer contributions deposited in their accounts. More complex, non-safe harbor retirement plans allow multi-year vesting schedules before employees fully own the employer contributions in their account. (Note that employees are always fully vested in their own employee contributions because this was always their money - they simply chose to direct some of it into the company retirement plan.)

One final characteristic of these safe harbor plans: they generally require most - and in many cases all - employees are included. More complex, non-safe harbor retirement plans allow more (though not much) flexibility in excluding certain classes of employees.

That's a Wrap 🎬

Alright - so that's it! I mean - I know it wasn't a small amount of information.

If anything's still unclear or confusing, please hit reply and let me know!

Hi there! I'm a financial planner for therapists!

David W. Frank

I help therapists navigate every element of their financial lives: from understanding your practice P&L and building a personal budget to managing student loan debt and investing for retirement... and everything in between. But don't let my love of the tax code and spreadsheets scare you off! You're just as likely to find me with my nose buried in one of Pema Chodron's books as reading up on the latest financial planning techniques.

Read more from Hi there! I'm a financial planner for therapists!

Hello Reader, Want the mindset that brings unlimited willpower? Keep reading and it could be yours! 👇 We’ve been taught that willpower is a limited resource. Many of us believe that willpower is like a battery – full at the start of the day, but depleted as the day wears on. And that this low battery leaves us vulnerable to poor impulse control and regrettable choices later in the day. And there is research seemingly backing up this limited view of willpower. The phenomenon came to be known...

15 days ago • 2 min read

Hello Reader, If you’ve been meaning to figure out a retirement plan for 2024, I’ve got just the webinar for you! Join Julie Herres and me as we guide practice owners through the maze of retirement options in this webinar. 👉 Click here to register! Whether you’re in solo practice or a group practice owner, we’ll break down the available choices, contribution limits, and help you figure out the best path for your future. It’s sure to be an informative session not to be missed if you’re...

28 days ago • 1 min read

Hello Reader, It wasn’t just a good day, it was a GREAT day. I was clear-headed, sharp, uber-productive. I was flying through my to-do list, and doing (IMHO) my best work, when I made a quick pivot to dispatch some emails. One email was from HR, announcing a change to the vacation policy. What? That’s interesting. Without hesitation, I click on the attached PDF to see if it was good news or bad. And just like that… I had been phished. I knew that clicking on a suspicious attachment could...

about 1 month ago • 1 min read
Share this post